Codebase comprehension infrastructure for AI coding agents
Two ways to deploy
On-prem container
Drop it in your CI/CD — like SonarQube
A self-contained Docker Compose appliance, distributed through a private registry. It indexes every commit inside your own pipeline and serves the skill graph from within your perimeter. Source code and embeddings never leave your network.
Zero-ops hosting on dedicated per-org Redis Cloud and Neo4j. Provisioning, billing, vector search, and tenant isolation are handled for you — connect a repo and start querying in minutes, no infrastructure to operate.
Redis CloudNeo4jPer-org isolationAuto-provisioned
Why now
The wall isn't technical anymore — it's financial. Most enterprise AI budgets were drawn up in late 2025, before agentic coding tools blew past every assumption behind them. Six months later, the bills are landing.
Uber exhausted its entire 2026 AI budget in four months. After putting Claude Code in front of roughly 5,000 engineers, per-developer token spend ran $500–$2,000 a month, and the company now caps usage at $1,500 per tool. Asked whether the spend was producing better products, its COO admitted it's “very hard to draw a line” to more useful features.
Sources:TechCrunch · TheStreet · reporting from Bloomberg, The Information & Business Insider
Microsoft cancelled most of its internal Claude Code licenses just six months after handing them to thousands of engineers — cost a clear factor, with the cutoff set to its June 30 fiscal year-end. When the industry's most aggressive AI adopter starts rationing the tool, the unit economics have a problem.
It's a pattern, not an outlier. The Wall Street Journal reports enterprises burning through annual AI budgets in as little as three months, with some bills doubling or tripling; Walmart has capped employee use of its own in-house agent too. Finance teams that spent a decade governing cloud spend have no playbook for token bills that scale nonlinearly.
The cause is the exact thing DevLoops removes: agents chain dozens of model calls and re-read the same codebase on every prompt, so you pay to ingest the same data thousands of times a day. Index it once, inject only the relevant nodes, and the curve bends back down — up to 85% fewer tokens, on-premise.
The enterprise math
Right now, your developers are pasting thousands of duplicate lines into cloud LLMs on every single prompt just to maintain context. You are paying for the exact same data ingestion thousands of times a day. DevLoops indexes your codebase once inside your CI/CD pipeline, lowering your token volume by up to 85% while keeping all data secure on-premise.
ROI CALCULATOR · ANNUAL
Each request is an agentic loop with a discovery phase (read, grep, trace to understand the code) and an edit phase (change it, run tests). Every model call re-sends the accumulating context, so cost grows with both the tokens pulled in and the number of round-trips. DevLoops collapses discovery — compact skill-graph and CPG answers instead of raw file reads — which is where the spend lives.
DEVELOPERS100
COMPLEX TASKS / DEV / DAY10
ASSUMPTIONS — tune the discovery & edit model
Without DevLoops · per task
DISCOVERY ROUND-TRIPS12
TOKENS PER DISCOVERY READ6,000
EDIT / VERIFY ROUND-TRIPS6
EDIT MATERIAL (target + diffs + logs)15,000
REASONING TOKENS / CALL (output)800
CACHING EFFICIENCY (on re-sent context)15%
With DevLoops · per task
DISCOVERY ROUND-TRIPS3
TOKENS PER SKILL-GRAPH / CPG ANSWER500
EDIT MATERIAL TRIMMED (less carried junk)25%
License
DEVLOOPS FLAT ANNUAL LICENSE
$
WITHOUT DEVLOOPS — full discovery loop$945,090
WITH DEVLOOPS — collapsed discovery + license$135,520
Per complex task: $3.94 → $0.46
Net annual savings
$809,570
~88% fewer tokens
ROI
3,238%
on license cost
Payback
< 1 mo
to break even
Models each request as an agentic loop with a discovery phase and an edit phase. Effective input per task reflects context re-ingestion across model calls — each call re-sends the accumulating transcript — so cutting round-trips saves more than linearly. Caching efficiency discounts re-sent stable context. Input/output rates are standard mode; 20 working days / month. DevLoops savings concentrate in discovery (fewer round-trips, compact skill-graph and CPG answers) and reduced carried context during edits; the final diff is unchanged. Results vary by workload and configuration. Pricing reflects published API rates as of June 2026.
DISCLAIMER · Illustrative estimate only, generated from the inputs you provide. Figures are projections, not a guarantee of savings, performance, or pricing, and do not constitute a binding offer or financial advice. Actual results depend on your usage, configuration, and provider pricing, which may change. Nothing here forms part of any contract.
THE PROBLEM
AI coding agents are amnesiac. Every session starts from zero. Every prompt re-reads the codebase. Context rot, hallucinated APIs, and brittle answers are the ceiling on agent reliability — and the bottleneck on adoption.
THE FIX
DevLoops ingests git history into a persistent skill graph — descriptions of what code achieves, stored in dedicated Redis Cloud per customer, queried via vector search. Agents call our API, get grounded answers in cents, never re-read the codebase.
Why this wins
Positioning
Infrastructure, not application
We don't compete with Claude Code, Cursor, or spec engines. We're the comprehension layer they all integrate.
Integrates, never competes
Moat
Defensible architecture
Skill formation, AST-anchored evidence, multi-tenant Redis isolation. Months of engineering, hard to replicate.
Months to replicate
Economics
Real margins
Standard mode: ~$0.04. Deep security reviews: ~$0.15. Margin room for pass-through pricing to dev tool partners.
~$0.04 per query
Distribution
Two way distribution
Run it either on the Cloud or through your CI/CD processes as a docker container.